Legibility of Japanese characters in graphic floor signs for elderly people

Authors

  • Takao Yanagihara Kindai University
  • Kiyohiro Omori The Hyogo Institute Assistive Technology
  • Hiroshi Kitagawa Hyogo Prefectural Rehabilitation Center at Nishi-Harima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v12i2.357

Abstract

For low-vision people and elderly people with decreased vision and cognitive function, the legibility of signs (character size, position, etc.) is an important issue. Graphic floor signs are considered more effective for low-vision people and elderly people than typical hanging signs because they are closer to pedestrians and can be larger in size. There is a growing number of improved graphic floor signs, but there are no guidelines for character sizes, colour scheme, and layout. Therefore, this study considers the character size ofgraphic floor signs that are legible for elderly people. In this study, we aimed to verify the legibility of characters installed on the floor. The test was conducted on 30 non-elderly and 30 elderly people, about Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS) S 0032 “Guidelines for the elderly and people with disabilities - Visual signs and displays -Estimation of minimum legible size for a Japanese single character”. Experiments on minimum legible sizes of characters and experiments on readability were conducted in that order. In the experiment on the minimum legible sizes of characters, we found that the minimum legible sizes of characters written on the vertical surface can be converted to the minimum size of legible characters written on the floor surface by multiplying with the coefficient of minimum legible characters on the floor surface by 2 to 3 times. In the experiment on readability, we found that the optimum character sizes are about 90 mm and 80 mm in height at a minimum for vertical and horizontal characters, respectively. These results showed that the optimum size of characters on graphic floor signs is about 90 mm.

References

Foundation for Promoting Personal Mobility and Ecological Transportation:Barrier-free maintenance guidelines,2020,http://www.ecomo.or.jp/barrierfree/guideline/data/guideline_shisetsu_202003_pdf.pdf (in Japanese)

Hiroshi Kitagawa:A setting and verification of floor sign at rail way staion,Proceedings of infrastructure planning,Voi.46,pp.1-4,2012. (in Japanese)

Kiyohiro OMORI, Takao YANAGIHARA, Hiroshi KITAGAWA, Norihiro IKEDA:Validation of Effectiveness of Graphic Floor Signs For Pedestrians With Low Vision And Normal Vision, Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers D3(Infrastructure Planning and Management),Vol.70,No.5,I_961-I_969,2014. (in Japanese)

Kiyohiro OMORI, Takao YANAGIHARA, Hiroshi KITAGAWA: validation of Effectiveness of Graphic Floor Signs for Elder Pedestrians, Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers D3(Infrastructure Planning and Management),Vol.72,No.5,I_1105-I_1113,2016. (in Japanese)

Meng-Cong Zheng, Tadao Shimizu, Kiminobu Sato: INFORMATION SIGNS BASED ON USERS' WAYFINDING BEHAVIOR IN TRANSFER BETWEEN ABOVE-GROUND STATIONS, Journal of the Science of Design, Vol.55,No.6,P.1-10,2009

Meng-Cong Zheng, Tadao Shimizu, Kiminobu Sato: INFORMATION SIGNS BASED ON USERS' WAYFINDING BEHAVIOR IN TRANSFER BETWEEN UNDER-GROUND STATIONS, Journal of the Science of Design, Vol.55,No.6,pp.39-48,2009

Ikeda, Y., Tsujimura, S., Yoshida, K., HIrate, K.,: Study on sign planning at a terminal station using "caption evaluation method" Basic study on the improvement of the ease of understanding of terminal stations, Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ) Vol. 82, No. 738, pp. 1905-1914, 2017.8 (in Japanese)

Yasue,M, Tsujimura, S, Ikeda, Y , Imanishi,M, Sano,Y: A STUDY ON USER EVALUATION ABOUT ADDITIONAL SIGN AT RAILWAY STATIONS FOCUSED ON INSTALLATION AMOUNT AND DESIGN ELEMENTS:Consideration of positive and negative elements of sign at railway stations Vol. 1, Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ) Vol. 83, No. 751, pp. 1669-1667, 2018.9 (in Japanese)

Yasue,M, Tsujimura, S, Imanishi,M, Ikeda, Y, Sano,Y: A STUDY ON USER EVALUATION ABOUT ADDITIONAL SIGN AT RAILWAY STATIONS FOCUSED ON INSTALLATION LOCATION:Consideration of positive and negative elements of sign at railway stations Vol. 2, Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ) Vol. 84, No. 764, pp. 2099-2108, 2019.10 (in Japanese)

Harada, M. : Visibility of Railway Ticket Gate Fare Charts : Influence of text size, viewing distance, and luminance to the visibility, Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 82, No. 735, pp. 417-424, 2017.5 (in Japanese)

Yung-Chin Tsao Shang-li Chu Ching-Huei Lai Shih-Yin Huang: UNIVERSAL DESIGN EVALUATION APPLIED ON STATION SIGN SYSTEM INNOVATION DESIGN, The International Journal of Organizational Innovation Volume 13 Number 1, 2020

J.B. Rousek, M.S. Hallbeck: Improving and analyzing signage within a healthcare setting, Applied Ergonomics 42 (2011) 771-784

Yusita Kusumarini*, Sherly de Yong, Diana Thamrin: Signage System of Malls in Surabaya: Universal interior design applications and suggestions for solution, Social and Behavioral Sciences 68 ( 2012 ) 515 – 525

Yuqi Shi , Yi Zhang,*, Tao Wang,*, Chaoyang Li and Shengqiang Yuan: The Effects of Ambient Illumination, Color Combination, Sign Height, and Observation Angle on the Legibility of Wayfinding Signs in Metro Stations, Sustainability,2020

Ken Sagawa, Kenji Kurakata: Estimation of legible font size for elderly people - Accessible design of characters in signs and displays and its standardization, Synthesiology Vol.6,No.1 PP.38-49,2013

Deborah Gold, Biljana Zuvela, Sue Hope: Comparing Two Fonts for Signage Accessibility in a Train Station, Visual Impairment and Blindness Vol.2,No.4 PP.159-167 2009

McLean, M.V. Brightness Contrast, Color Contrast, and Legibility. Hum. Factors 7, PP.521–527, 1965

Article cover

Downloads

Published

2022-11-30

How to Cite

Yanagihara, T., Omori, K., & Kitagawa, H. (2022). Legibility of Japanese characters in graphic floor signs for elderly people. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 12(2), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v12i2.357