• Francisco Iniesto Institute of Educational Technology, the Open University, Milton Keynes. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3946-3056
  • Covadonga Rodrigo Department of Languages and Computer Systems, School of Computer Science, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid.




MOOC, accessibility, employability, standards, metadata, social inclusion


The flexibility of the MOOC service allows students to learn at their own time, place and pace, enhancing continuous communication and interaction between all participants in knowledge and community building. This model especially benefits people with disabilities, which can improve therefore their level of employability and social inclusion, reaching a better quality of life. Unfortunately the access to MOOC platforms present severe barriers: there is a lack of accessibility on the learning resources, the communicating tools and personalized user interfaces. All these issues add extra difficulties such as the need to develop specific digital or even social skills for students with functional diversity. In this context, MOOCs are leading a revolutionary computer and mobile-based scenario along with social technologies that will emerge new kinds of learning applications that enhance communication and collaboration processes. For that reason, this paper describes the need for designing an information model and related specifications to support a new strategy for delivering accessible MOOC courses to learners with special needs, in terms of their preferences and context of use based on a particular application profile. This user profile’s design is based on standard metadata schemas, data that provides information about other data, regarding the achievement of accessibility from content to user preferences.


Al-Mouh N. A., Al-Khalifa A. S., & Al-Khalifa H. S. (2014). A first look into MOOCs accessibility: The case of coursera. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8547 LNCS (PART 1), 145–152. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08596-8_22

Bohnsack, M., & Puhl, S. (2014). Accessibility of MOOCs. Computers Helping People with Special Needs, 141–144. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08596-8_21

Boticario, J. G., Rodriguez-Ascaso, A., Santos, O. C., Raffenne, E., Montandon, L., Roldán, D., & Buendía, F. (2012). Accessible Lifelong Learning at Higher Education: Outcomes and Lessons Learned at two Different Pilot Sites in the EU4ALL Project. JUCS - Journal of Universal Computer Science, 18(1), 62–85. http://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-018-01-0062

Catarci, T., De Giovanni, L., Gabrielli, S., Kimani, S., & Mirabella, V. (2008). Scaffolding the design of accessible eLearning content: a user-centered approach and cognitive perspective. Cognitive processing, 9(3), 209-216.

Centelles Velilla, M., Vázquez Guzmán, C., Ribera, M., & Pérez Pineda, I. (2014). Asignación de metadatos de accesibilidad a vídeos docentes, INNOVADOC (Documents d'Innovació Docent) Retrieved from http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/handle/2445/60425

Cullen, R. (2001). Addressing the digital divide. Online information review, 25(5), 311-320.

Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and Connective Knowledge: essays on meaning and learning networks. National Research Council Canada, Retrieved from: http://www.downes.ca/files/books/Connective_Knowledge-19May2012.pdf

Downes, S. (2013). What the “x”in “xMOOC”stands for. Retrieved from: https://plus.google.com/+StephenDownes/posts/LEwaKxL2MaM

EU4ALL (2010). Retrieved from: https://adenu.ia.uned.es/web/es/projects/eu4all

Green, S., Jones, R., Pearson, E., & Gkatzidou, S. (2013). Accessibility and adaptability of learning objects: responding to metadata, learning patterns and profiles of needs and preferences. ALT-J, 14(1), 117-129.

Jansen, D., & Schuwer, R. (2015). Institutional MOOC strategies in Europe. Status report based on a mapping survey conducted in October - December 2014 EADTU, ISBN 978-90-79730-15-5. Retrieved from: http://eadtu.eu/documents/Publications/OEenM/Institutional_MOOC_strategies_in_Europe.pdf

Iglesias, A., Moreno, L., Martínez, P., & Calvo, R. (2014). Evaluating the accessibility of three open-source learning content management systems: A comparative study. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 22(2), 320–328. http://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20557

IMS AccessForAll Metadata. Information Model. (2004). Retrieved from: http://www.imsglobal.org/accessibility/accmdv1p0/imsaccmd_infov1p0.html

IMS Global Access For All (AfA) Digital Resource Description (DRD) Specification Information Model. (2012). Retrieved from: https://www.imsglobal.org/accessibility/accdrdv2p0/html/ISO_ACCDRDv2p0_InfoModelv1.html

IMS Global Access For All (AfA) Personal Needs & Preferences (PNP) Specification Information Model. Version 3.0 Specification (2012). Retrieved from: http://www.imsglobal.org/accessibility/afav3p0pd/AfA3p0_PNPinfoModel_v1p0pd.html

IMS Global's Accessibility Metadata Project. (2014). Retrieved from: http://a11ymetadata.imsglobal.org/

IMS Learner Information Package Accessibility for LIP Information Model (2003). Retrieved from: http://www.imsglobal.org/accessibility/acclipv1p0/imsacclip_infov1p0.html

IMS Learner Information Package Specification (2001). Retrieved from: http://www.imsglobal.org/profiles/index.html

Information technology -- Individualized adaptability and accessibility in e-learning, education and training -- Part 2: "Access for all" personal needs and preferences for digital delivery. (2008). Retrieved from: http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=43603

Iniesto, F., Rodrigo, C., & Moreira Teixeira, A. (2014). Accessibility analysis in MOOC platforms. A case study : UNED COMA and UAb iMOOC. In V Congreso Internacional sobre Calidad y Accesibilidad de la Formación Virtual (CAFVIR 2014) 545–550. Retrieved from: http://oro.open.ac.uk/45192/

Iniesto, F.; & Rodrigo, C., Accessibility assessment of MOOC platforms in Spanish: UNED COMA, COLMENIA and Miriada X. (2014). Computers in Education (SIIE), 2014 International Symposium on vol., no., pp.169, 172, 12-14

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SIIE.2014.7017724

Iniesto, F., & Rodrigo, C. (2014). Pautas para la evaluación de la accesibilidad en las plataformas MOOC. In VI Congreso Internacional sobre Aplicación de Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicaciones Avanzadas (ATICA2014) 57–64. Retrieved from: http://oro.open.ac.uk/45191/

ISO/IEC e-learning standard will help match user needs with the right resources (2009). Retrieved from: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/news_index/news_archive/news.htm?refid=Ref1217

Koon, R., & De la Vega, M. E. (2000). El impacto tecnológico en las

personas con discapacidad. In II Congreso Iberoamericano de Informática Educativa Especial, Córdoba.

Learning Resource Metadata Initiative (2014). Retrieved from: http://lrmi.dublincore.net/

Martin, L., Gutiérrez y Restrepo, E., Barrera, C., Rodríguez Ascaso, A., Santos, O. C., & Boticario, J. G. (2007). Usability and Accessibility Evaluations Along the eLearning Cycle. Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2007 Workshops, 453–458. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77010-7_44

Metadata-enabled Tools for Assistive Living and Learning (METALL). Retrieved from: https://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk/projects/metall

Mirri, S., Salomoni, P., & Prandi, C. (2011). Augment browsing and standard profiling for enhancing web accessibility. In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (p. 5). ACM.

Morrison, D. (2013). The ultimate student guide to xMOOCs and CMOOCs. MOOC News and Reviews. Retrieved from: http://moocnewsandreviews.com/ultimate-guide-to-xmoocs-and-cmoocso

Neville, L., Cooper, M., Heath, A., Rothbergeine, M., & Treviranus, J. (2005). Learner-centred Accessibility for Interoperable Web-based Educational Systems. In: International World Wide Web Conference (WWW2005), 10-14 May 2005, Chiba, Japan.

Pallisera, M., & Bonjoch, M. (2007). ¿Y después del trabajo, qué?: más allá de la integración laboral de las personas con discapacidad. Revista de Educación, (342), 329–348. Revista acreditada por la FECYT

Rodrigo C., & Iniesto F. (2015). Holistic vision for creating accessible services based on MOOCs. Open Education Global Conference. 22-24 April 2015. Banff, Alberta, Canada. Retrieved from http://conference.oeconsortium.org/2015/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/oeglobal2015_submission_49.pdf

Rodríguez-Ascaso, A., & Boticario, J. G. (2015). Accesibilidad y MOOC: Hacia una perspectiva integral. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 18 (2), 61-85. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ried.18.2.13670

Salomoni, P., Mirri, S., Ferretti, S., & Roccetti, M. (2007). Profiling learners with special needs for custom e-learning experiences, a closed case?. In Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A) (pp. 84-92). ACM.

Sanchez-Gordon, S., & Luján-Mora, S. (2013). Web accessibility of MOOCs for elderly students. 2013 12th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, ITHET 2013, 1–6. http://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET.2013.6671024

Sanchez-gordon, S., & Luján-mora, S. (2015). Adaptive Content Presentation Extension for Open edX Enhancing MOOCs Accessibility for Users with Disabilities. The Eighth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions Adaptive, (c), 181–183.

Siemens, G. (2012). MOOCs are really a platform. ELearnspace, Retrieved from: http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/07/25/moocs-are-really-a-platform.

Tyler-Smith, K. (2006). Early attrition among first time eLearners: A review of factors that contribute to drop-out, withdrawal and non-completion rates of adult learners undertaking eLearning programmes. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 73–85.

Vilà, M., Pallisera, M., & Fullana, J. (2007). Work integration of people with disabilities in the regular labour market: What can we do to improve these processes? Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 32(1), 10–18.

WAI-ARIA. (2014). Retrieved from: https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/aria

Zapata-Ros, M. (2013). MOOCs, una visión crítica y una alternativa complementaria: La individualización del aprendizaje y de la ayuda pedagógica. Campus Virtuales | Revista Cientifica de Tecnología Educativa, 2(1), 20–38. Retrieved from http://www.revistacampusvirtuales.es/index.php/es/revistaes/numerosanteriores/29-voliinum1/67-voliinum1-art2




How to Cite

Iniesto, F., & Rodrigo, C. (2016). A PRELIMINARY STUDY FOR DEVELOPING ACCESSIBLE MOOC SERVICES. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 6(2), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v6i2.117