A participatory qualitative analysis of barriers of public transport by persons with disabilities from seven European cities
AbstractAlthough there is literature published by a considerable number of scientific publications regarding disability and transport, the affected persons are only very rarely involved in the research. The paper presents the results of two qualitative studies conducted jointly with persons with different forms of disabilities: i) a social media content analysis and ii) peer-to-peer interviews with persons with disabilities (N = 49). The studies aimed to identify barriers that persons with access needs face during their trips with public transport. In line with a participatory approach, persons with disabilities from seven European cities were involved in conducting the research allowing for new interpretations of transport equity issues. Qualitative content analysis of both studies revealed barriers clustered into eight categories: regulations, public awareness and assistance, information provision and communication, infrastructure, vehicles, general service quality, stops and stations and emotional barriers. The two studies highlight important factors that influence disabled users’ experiences of public transport. Upon reflection, the paper derives research hypotheses and demonstrates the value of involving people with disabilities in the analysis of disability research to derive in-depth insights about equity in transport.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 35(4), 216-224.
Bezyak, J.L.; Sabella, S.A.; Gattis, R.H. Public Transportation: An Investigation of Barriers for People with Disabilities. J. Disabil. Policy Stud. 2017, 28, 52–60.
Bigby, C., Frawley, P., & Ramcharan, P. (2014). Conceptualizing inclusive research with people with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27(1), 3-12.
Edén, L., Andersson, H. I., Ejlertsson, G., Ekström, B. I., Johansson, Y., & Leden, I. (2007). Characteristics of disability pensioners returning to work: an interview study among individuals with musculoskeletal disorders. Disability and rehabilitation, 29(22), 1720-1726.
European Parliament (2011). Regulation (EU) No 181/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 concerning the rights of passengers in bus and coach transport and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 Text with EEA relevance. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32011R0181
Gössling, S. (2020). Integrating e-scooters in urban transportation: Problems, policies, and the prospect of system change. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 79, 102230 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102230
Grewal, I. Joy, S., Lewis, J., Swales, K. & Woodfield, K. (2002).Disabled for Life: attitudes towards and experiences of, disability in Great Britain. Research Report 173. London: Department for Work and Pensions.
Hanson, J. (2004). The inclusive city: delivering a more accessible urban environment through inclusive design.
Harahap, R. M., Santosa, I., Wahjudi, D. & Martokusumo, W. (2020). Study of interiority application in deaf space based lecture space. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 10(2), 229 -26.
Höglund, B., & Larsson, M. (2013). Struggling for motherhood with an intellectual disability—A qualitative study of women’s experiences in Sweden. Midwifery, 29(6), 698–704. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.014
Keeley, C., Munde, V., Schowalter, R., Seifert, M., Tillmann, V., & Wiegering, R. (2019). Partizipativ forschen mit Menschen mit komplexem Unterstützungsbedarf. Teilhabe, Jg, 58.
Kett, M., Cole, E., & Turner, J. (2020). Disability, Mobility and Transport in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: A Thematic Review. Sustainability, 12(2), 589.
Kitchin, R. (2000). The researched opinions on research: Disabled people and disability research. Disability & Society, 15(1), 25-47.
König, A., Hatzakis, T.; Andrushevich, A.; Hoogerwerf, E., Vasconcelos, E., Bagnasco, M.; Alciauskaite, L.; Barbosa, S. & Andersen, K. (2021). A Reflection on Participatory Research Methodologies in the Light of the Coronavirus Pandemic – Lessons Learnt from the European Research Project TRIPS. Open Research Europe (in review).
Liddiard, K.; Runswick‐Cole, K.; Goodley, D.; Whitney, S.; Vogelmann, E.; Watts, L.(2019). “I was Excited by the Idea of a Project that Focuses on those Unasked Questions” Co‐Producing Disability Research with Disabled Young People. Children & Society 33(2), 154-167. doi:10.1111/chso.12308
Liedberg, G. M., & Henriksson, C. M. (2002). Factors of importance for work disability in women with fibromyalgia: an interview study. Arthritis Care & Research, 47(3), 266-274.
Lomax, C. L., Brown, R. G., & Howard, R. J. (2004). Measuring disability in patients with neurodegenerative disease using the ‘Yesterday Interview’. International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 19(11), 1058-1064.
Macnamara, J. (2005). Media content analysis: Its uses; benefits and best practice methodology. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 6(1), 1–34
Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. A companion to qualitative research, 1(2004), 159-176.
Park, J., & Chowdhury, S. (2018). Investigating the barriers in a typical journey by public transport users with disabilities. Journal of transport & health, 10, 361-368.
Peters, A. J. (2003). Isolation or inclusion: Creating safe spaces for lesbian and gay youth. Families in Society, 84(3), 331-337.
Scannell, L., Cox, R. S., & Fletcher, S. (2017). Place‐based loss and resilience among disaster‐affected youth. Journal of community psychology, 45(7), 859-876.
Schmidt, K. D. (2017). Talking Through It: Using Student to Student Interviews and Brainstorming Activities for Facilitating Critical Inquiry. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 22(2-3), 63-72.
Shakespeare, T. (2006). The social model of disability. The disability studies reader, 2, 197-204.
Vedeler, J. S. (2014). Disabled persons’ job interview experiences: stories of discrimination, uncertainty and recognition. Disability & Society, 29(4), 597-610.
Wilson, L. M. (2003). An overview of the literature on disability and transport. Disability Rights Commission, London.
Wright, D., Corner, J., Hopkinson, J., & Foster, C. (2006). Listening to the views of people affected by cancer about cancer research: an example of participatory research in setting the cancer research agenda. Health Expectations, 9(1), 3-12.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Alexandra König, Anne Seiler, Laura Alčiauskaitė, Tally Hatzakis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share or adapt the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Use of the work for commercial purposes are not allowed.
- Authors are able to publish the journal's published version of the work in other media (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as far as they inform the Journal of Accessibility and Design for All of that fact. When publishing their work in other sources, authors must mention the name of the Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, its ISSN, the number and issue in which the article was published and a link to the main page of the Journal of Accessibility and Design for All. Optionally, they can also include a link to the article published in the Journal of Accessibility and Design for All.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.