Universal design pedagogy through a charrette to increase professional sensitivity

Doris C.C.K. Kowaltowski, Núbia Bernardi, Cláudia Maria Martin

Abstract


This paper describes a design Charrette conducted in a graduate course on Universal Design (UD) in which students developed a design project for a public-service centre. The Charrette involved potential users with various disabilities, evaluating the design proposal, using tactile maps, as well as other communication media. Wayfinding issues relating to the design of a service centre were transformed into flowcharts, both as diagrams and tactile representations. The participation of disabled users was evaluated. The goal of the Charrette was to understand the effectiveness of this type of teaching method to increase designers’ sensitivity to UD issues and gain knowledge on participatory processes with users who have varied disabilities. The results showed that the Charrette as a teaching method was successful in making the student group focus on the questions of UD. However, students continued to be primarily concerned with the design’s formal aesthetic aspects, and the process differed little from traditional designerly ways of doing things. This demonstrates the need to improve design education, adopting multidisciplinary approaches, which strengthen design considerations for UD. An analysis of the participatory phase showed that potential users with visual disabilities had difficulties understanding the design and wheelchair users criticized various aspects of access and barrier-free wayfinding. Recommendations are presented. To increase the sensitivity of professional designers to UD issues, potential users with disabilities should participate from the start in the design process to give input as the proposal is developed. Introducing a multidisciplinary design team should also be tested to include a larger variety of viewpoints in the design process, which may strengthen the concern for elements of a building design that directly affect person-environment relationships. 


Keywords


Universal Design (UD), Building Design Process, Design Pedagogy, Wayfinding, Design Charrette, Tactile maps

Full Text:

PDF

References


ABNT (2004), Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. Acessibilidade de pessoas portadoras de deficiência a edificações, espaço, mobiliário e equipamento urbanos, NBR-9050 (2004).

Afacan, Y. & Erbug, C. (2009). An interdisciplinary heuristic evaluation method for universal building design. Applied Ergonomics, 40(4), 731–744. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2008.07.002.

Altay, B., & Demirkan, H. (2014). Inclusive design: developing students’ knowledge and attitude through empathic modelling. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(2), 196–217. DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2013.764933.

Bachman, C. & Bachman, L. (2009). Self-identity, rationalisation and cognitive dissonance in undergraduate architectural design learning. ARQ: Architectural Research Quarterly, 13(3), 315. DOI: 10.1017/S1359135510000163.

Barnes, C. (2011). Understanding disability and the importance of design for all. Journal Of Accessibility And Design For All, 1(1), 30. Retrieved from http://www.jacces.org/index.php/jacces/article/view/81.

Bernardi, N., D’Abreu, J.V.V., Kowaltowski, D.C.C.K., & Capeli, G.A. (2011). Universal Tactile Language, Assistance To Spatial Perception. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Best Practices in Universal Design, FICCDA (pp. 01–04).

Bernardi, N., & Kowaltowski, D. C. (2010). When role playing is not enough: improved universal design education. ArchNet-IJAR International Journal of Architectural Research, 4, 376–390.

Brasil (2000). Acessibilidade das pessoas com deficiência ou mobilidade reduzida. Lei 10.098/00 (2000).

Brent, R., Eubank, W., Danley, M. & Graham, C. (1993). Hands-On Approach to the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Interior Design, 19(1), 47–50.

Christophersen, J. (2002). Universal design: 17 ways of thinking and teaching. Oslo, Norway: Husbanken.

Clayton, M., Kunz, J. & Fischer, M. (1998). The Charrette test method (No. 120). Stanford, CA, USA, Stanford University: Centre For Integrated Facility Engneering.

Cohen, R. & Duarte, C.R. (2010). Acessibilidade como fator de construção do lugar. In Desenho Universal: caminhos da acessibilidade no Brasil (pp. 81–94). São Paulo, SP, Brazil: Annablume.

Connell, B. R., Jones, M., Mace, R., Mueller, J., Mullick, A., & Ostroff, E. (1997). The Principles of Universal Design. NC State University Press.

D’Souza, N. (2009). Revisiting a Vitruvian preface: The value of multiple skills in contemporary architectural pedagogy. Architectural Research Quarterly, 13(2), 173–181.

Danko, S. M. I. D., Meneely, J., & Portillo, M. (2006). Humanizing Design through Narrative Inquiry. Journal of Interior Design, 31, 2, 10-28.

Dischinger, M. (2000). Designing for all senses: accessible spaces for visually impaired citizens. (Doctoral Thesis). Thesis (Doctor of Phiolosophy)-Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Göteburg, Sweden.

Dischinger, M., Ely, V. H. M. B., & Piardi, S. M. D. Gr. (2012). Promovendo acessibilidade espacial nos edifícios públicos: programa de acessibilidade às pessoas com deficiência ou mobilidade reduzida nas edificações de uso público. Florianópolis: Ministério Público de Santa Catarina, 135.

Dorneles, V. G. & Bins Ely, V. H. M. (2012). Estratégias de ensino de desenho universal: uma experiência didática no curso de arquitetura da UFSC. Revista Ação Ergonômica, 7(3), 18–33.

Duarte, C.R.S. & Cohen, R.O. (2003). O Ensino da Arquitetura Inclusiva como Ferramenta para a Melhoria da Qualidade de Vida para Todos. In Marques, S. & Lara, F. Projetar: Desafios e Conquistas da Pesquisa e do Ensino de Projeto. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, Editora Virtual Científica, (159–173).

Franz, J. M., & Lehmann, S. (2004). Side-by-side: A pedagogical basis for (design) transdisciplinarity. IDEA Journal, 2004, 9–30.

Gann, D., Salter, A., & Whyte, J. (2003). Design Quality Indicator as a tool for thinking. Building Research & Information, 31(5), 318–333.

Gardener, H. (1990). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Emotional Intelligence. New York, NY, USA, Basic Books, Simon & Schuster.

Gehl, J. (2011). Life Between Buildings: using public spaces. Washington DC, USA, Island Press.

Hadjiyanni, T. (2008). Beyond concepts-a studio pedagogy for preparing tomorrow’s designers. Archnet IJAR-International Journal of Architectural Research, 2(2), 41–46.

Heller, M.A. (2000). Touch, representation and blindness (Debates in psychology). Oxford, MA, USA, Oxford University Press.

Herssens, J., & Heylighen, A. (2008). Haptics and Vision in Architecture (pp. 102–112). Presented at the Proceedings Sensory Urbanism Proceedings, Glasgow, UK: Flâneur Press.

Howell, P. & Ionides, J. (2008). Design and Communication in a Multi-sensory Environment. Strathprints Institutional Repository, 113–231.

Hunter, S. (2010). Design Resources: Architectural Wayfinding (No. DR 01) (p. 08). Buffalo, NY, USA: Centre for inclusive design and environmental access - IDEA.

IBGE (2012), Censo demográfico 2010 - Características gerais da população, religião e pessoas com deficiência, (pp. 1–215). Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.

Kowaltowski, D.C.C.K. (1980). Humanization In Architecture: Analysis Of Themes Through Highschool Building Problems. UCB - University of California, Berkeley CED - College of Environmental Design, Berkeley.

Kowaltowski, D.C.C.K., Bianchi, G. & de Paiva, V.T. (2010). Methods that may stimulate creativity and their use in architectural design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(4), 453–476.

Lennertz, B. & Lutzenhiser, A. (2006), The Charrette handbook, The American Planning Association, Chicago, IL, USA.

Lifchez, R. (1986). Rethinking architecture: Design students and physically disabled people. Berkeley, CA, USA, University of California Press.

Luck, R. (2003). Dialogue in participatory design. Design Studies, 24(6), 523–535.

Luck, R. (2007). Learning to talk to users in participatory design situations. Design Studies, 28(3), 217–242.

Luck, R., Haenlein, H., & Bright, K. (2001). Project briefing for accessible design. Design Studies, 22(3), 297–315.

McGuire, J. M. (2011). Inclusive college teaching: universal design for instruction and diverse learners. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 1(1), 16, 38-54.

McLaughlin, E.A. (2013). Design Charrette as Methodology for Student Learning Assessment Relative to Building Safety and Security. Journal of Interior Design, 38(2), 35–46.

Morrow, R. (2001). Universal design as a critical tool in design education. In W. F. E. Preiser & E. Ostroff (Eds.), The Universal Design Handbook (pp. 54.1–54.16). Boston, MA, USA, McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Morton, J. (2012). Communities of practice in higher education: A challenge from the discipline of architecture. Linguistics and Education, 23(1), 100–111.

Nicol, D. & Pilling, S. (2000). Changing architectural education: Towards a new professionalism. Oxford, UK, Taylor & Francis.

Nussbaumer, L. L. (2009). Evidence-Based Design for Interior Designers. New York : Oxford: Fairchild Books.

Nussbaumer, L. L. (2011). Inclusive Design: A Universal Need (1 edition.). New York : London: Fairchild Books.

Onyango, J.O. & Noguchi, M. (2009). Changing attitudes of community through the design Charrette process. The International Journal of Neighboorhood Renewal, 1(30), 19–30.

Ostrom, A.L., Bitner, M.J., Brown, S. W., Burkhard, K.A., Goul, M., Smith-Daniels, V., … Rabinovich, E. (2010). Moving forward and making a difference: Research priorities for the science of service. Journal of Service Research, 13(1), 4–36.

Painelli, S. (2008). Poupatempo: Um Programa de Atendimento ao cidadão (Masters Dissertation). Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Paulsson, J. (2005). Universal Design Education Project–Sweden, NHR, The National Swedish Association of Persons with Neurological Disabilities, Göteborg, Sweden.

Peña, W.M. & Parshall, S.A. (2012). Problem Seeking: An Architectural Programming Primer (5th ed.). New Jersey, USA, Wiley & Sons.

Prado, A., Lopes, M.E. & Ornstein, S.W. (2010). Desenho Universal: caminhos da acessibilidade no Brasil. São Paulo, SP, Brazil, Annablume.

Preiser, W., & Smith, K. H. (2010). Universal Design Handbook, 2E (2 edition.). New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.

Quayle, M. & Paterson, D. (1989). Techniques for encouraging reflection in design. Journal of Architectural Education, 42(2), 30–42.

Radford, A. D. & Stevens, G. (1988). Role-play in education: A case study from architectural computing. Journal of Architectural Education, 42(1), 18–23.

Ribeiro, L. G. (2004). Ergonomia no Ambiente Construído–Um Estudo de Caso em Aeroportos (Masters Dissertation). Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Ryhl, C. (2009). Architecture for the senses. Inclusive Buildings, Products & Services: Challenges in Universal Design, 105.

Salama, A. (2005). Skill-based/knowledge-based architectural pedagogies: An argument for creating humane environments. In Proceedings of 7th International Conference of the IAHH-International Association of Humane Habitat-Enlightening Learning Environments, Mumbai, India, (pp. 29-31).

Sanoff, H. (2011). Participatory/Collaborative Design Process. In S. Mallory-Hill, W. F. E. Preiser, & Watson (Eds.), Enhancing Building Performance (pp. 48 – 59). Chichester, UK, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Sassaki, R. K. (1997). Inclusão: construindo uma sociedade para todos (Vol. 174). WVA.

Schermer, B. (2001). Client-Situated Architectural Practice: Implications for Architectural Education. Journal of Architectural Education, 55(1), 31-42.

Souza, U. da S. R. de. (2008). Arquitetura e Direitos Humanos: o Desenho Universal na Promoção do Direito à Moradia (Doctoral Thesis). Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ., Brazil.

Staub, A. & Lulo, L.D. (2011). User-Participation and the Design Charrette: A Systematic Approach to Furthering Design Process. In ARCC 2011 Considering Research: Reflecting upon current themes in Architectural Research. Detroit, MI, USA, 305-314.

Stiffler, E. (1990). Teaching a Course in Environments for Special Needs. Journal of Interior Design, 16(1), 23–28.

Tyler, N. (2011). Capabilities and accessibility: a model for progress. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 1(1), 11, 12-22.

Voordt, D. J. M. van der, Vrielink, D., & Wegen, H. B. R. van. (1997). Comparative Floorplan-Analysis in programming and architectural design. Design Studies, 18(1), 67–88.

Welch, P. (1995). Strategies for Teaching Universal Design. Boston, MA, USA, Mig Communications, Adaptive Environments Centre.

Woolner, P. (2009). Building Schools for the Future through a participatory design process: exploring the issues and investigating ways forward. In: BERA2009 (pp. 1–17). Presented at The British Education Association Conference, Manchester, UK.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v5i1.91

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Accessibility and Design for All

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Journal of Accessibility and Design for All. ISSN 2013-7087.
www.jacces.org

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.