Connecting UD theory to tool selection in the design process
Tool use as theory implementation.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v16i2.717Abstract
This article reports on a five-phase study into communicating Universal Design theory so as to align tool use to UD design outcomes. It explains how to apply a method for strengthening the connection between UD and implementation. This study builds on research which indicates designers lack explicit UD justification for design tool selection. The study describes a teaching method for UD that encourages students to actively consider what elements of a design problem require direct user-involvement and what tools might be appropriate to achieve this end. The study shows that the process of categorization and organization of categories raises awareness of design tools generally and user-centred design tools in particular. The study also indicates that educators in UD and design generally should be concerned about the number and type of design tools their students are aware of and use.
References
Beck, J., & Stolterman, E. (2016) Examining practical, everyday theory use in design research. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2(2), 125-140. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.010
Bianchin, M., & Heylighen, A. (2018) Just design. Design Studies, 54, 1-22. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.001
Dalsgaard, P. (2017) Instruments of inquiry: Understanding the nature and role of tools in design. International Journal of Design, 11(1). https://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/
article/view/2275
D’souza, N., (2004) Is universal design a critical theory?. In Designing a more inclusive world (pp. 3-9). Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-372-5_1
Fawcett, J. (1978) The relationship between theory and research: A double helix. Advances in Nursing Science, 1(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-197810000-00007
Goertz, G., & Mahoney, J. (2012). A tale of two cultures: Qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400845446
Herriott, R., (2011) Infrastructure of justice?: Citizen participation in public transport. In Wer Gestaltet Gestaltung?. http://www.dgtf.de/pinnwand/1257
Herriott, R. (2013) Are inclusive designers designing inclusively? An analysis of 66 design cases. The design journal, 16(2), 138-158. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630613X135843679
84820
Herriott, R., & Akoglu, C. (2020). Tools, methods or theories in design research?. Research & Education in Design: People & Processes & Products & Philosophy, 166-173. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003046103
Herriott, R (2023) The relation of design tools to universal design theory. Journal of Accessibility and Design For All. 13 (2). https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v13i2.461
Herriott, R. (2024) The Incidence of Theoretical Content in Universal Design Research. The International Journal of Designed Objects, 18(2), 139. DOI:10.18848/2325-1379/CGP/v18i02/139-156
Herriott, R., & Jackson, A. R. (2025, September). How playing or making card games can support Universal Design teaching. In LearnXDesign2025. https://doi.org/10.21606/drslxd.
2025.036
Heylighen, A., & Bianchin, M. (2013) How does inclusive design relate to good design? Designing as a deliberative enterprise. Design Studies, 34(1), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.destud.2012.05.002
Heylighen, A (2014) About the nature of design in universal design. Disability and rehabilitation 36, no. 16 (2014): 1360-1368. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.932850
IBM (2025) Defining Use Cases. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/engineering-lifecycle-management-suite/doors-next/7.0.3?topic=requirements-defining-use-cases
Jones, D., & Gregor, S. (2007) The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(5), 1. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/32762
Martin, B. & Hanington, B. (2009) Universal methods of design. Rockport publishers, Gloucester, MA, USA.
Ostroff, E (2011) Universal Design: an evolving paradigm. McGraw Hill Professional, 2001, Bolsover, UK.
Persson, H., Åhman, H., Yngling, A. A., & Gulliksen, J. (2015) Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(4), 505-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0358-z
Sileyew, K. J. (2019) Research design and methodology (pp. 1-12). Rijeka: IntechOpen.
Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
Scott I, McLachlan F, Brookfield K. (2018) Inclusive design and pedagogy: An outline of three innovations. Built Env. 2018; 44 (1): 9-22. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.44.1.9
Stephanidis, C., Savidis, A. (2001) Universal Access in the information society: Methods, Tools and Interaction Technologies. UAIS (2001) 1: 40-55https://doi.org/10.1007/s102090100008
Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (2005) Research in organizations: Foundations and methods in inquiry. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, NY, USA.
Van Maanen, J., Sørensen, J. B., & Mitchell, T. R. (2007) The interplay between theory and method. Academy of management review, 32(4), 1145-1154. https://doi.org/10.5465/
amr.2007.26586080
Wacker, J. G. (1998) A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of operations management, 16(4), 361-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00019-9
Watchorn V, Larkin H, Ang S, Ditch, D. (2013) Strategies and effectiveness of teaching universal design in a cross-faculty setting. Teaching in H. Ed. 2013 18(5): 477-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752730
Zawawi, D. (2007). Quantitative versus qualitative methods in social sciences: bridging the gap. Integration & Dissemination, 1.
Zhu, H., Gruber, T. and Dong, H., (2020) Value and Values in Inclusive Design. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 109-122). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50252-2_9
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Herriott R.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share or adapt the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Use of the work for commercial purposes are not allowed.
- Authors are able to publish the journal's published version of the work in other media (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as far as they inform the Journal of Accessibility and Design for All of that fact. When publishing their work in other sources, authors must mention the name of the Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, its ISSN, the number and issue in which the article was published and a link to the main page of the Journal of Accessibility and Design for All. Optionally, they can also include a link to the article published in the Journal of Accessibility and Design for All.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
